Risk management
July 15, 2025
3 mins read

Red Team Testing vs. Traditional Security Audits: What’s More Effective?

Wondering whether red team testing or a traditional security audit is more effective? This guide breaks down the difference, when to use each, and why real-world simulations catch what paperwork reviews often miss.

Red Team Testing vs. Traditional Security Audits: What’s More Effective?

Red Team Testing vs. Traditional Security Audits: What’s More Effective?

A Decision-Maker’s Guide to Finding the Gaps Before Intruders Do

Security audits are great for documentation. Red team tests are great for reality checks. If you're wondering which is right for your business, you’re not alone. We break down the differences, what each method reveals, and when to use one over the other.

What Is a Traditional Security Audit?

A traditional audit reviews your existing security policies, access controls, alarm systems, personnel protocols, and incident response procedures. Most audits:

  • Follow a checklist or compliance standard
  • Evaluate written policies and physical safeguards
  • Interview staff or supervisors
  • Deliver a formal report with findings and suggestions

These audits are useful for checking if you meet specific regulations or internal requirements. But they usually assume people follow the rules exactly as written.

What Is Red Team Testing?

Red team testing simulates real-world breaches. It’s like hiring ethical intruders to act like malicious ones. Red teamers attempt unauthorized entry, social engineering, badge spoofing, or system bypasses—without tipping off your staff.

They don’t look for paperwork errors. They look for blind spots in human behavior, physical access points, and response times.

A red team test answers one question: can someone get in?

Key Differences Between Red Teaming and Security Audits

AuditRed Team TestReviews documentation and setupsSimulates real-world breachesStructured and controlledCreative and adaptiveTests what should happenTests what actually happensFocuses on complianceFocuses on vulnerability

Why Audits Alone Aren’t Enough

In many buildings, security policies are clear—but staff forget them. Access points look locked, but doors are propped open. Cameras are installed, but never monitored. These gaps don’t show up in audits.

Red team testing exposes these oversights. It shows how your systems behave under real pressure.

Which Should You Choose?

The best answer? Use both. Audits help maintain compliance. Red team testing shows you where your defenses fail.

If your goal is to check a box, start with an audit.If your goal is to protect people, assets, or reputations, schedule a red team test.

How Braav Does It Differently

At Braav, we combine both:

  • We begin with audits to understand your environment
  • Then run tailored red team operations to test it in practice
  • We give you a resilience score and a plan to close every gap

You get the best of both worlds—compliance and real-world resilience.

Ready to test what actually works? Contact us for a Red Team assessment.

Let’s Make Your Business Safer.

Need a quick consult or full security assessment? We’re here to help.